Probably the most interesting. One group that I'm meeting with here are our other bank CEOs, because we are having this moment in D.C. about getting market structure legislation passed and the bills made good progress that got a strong bipartisan vote in the House. It's now being deliberated in the Senate. And there was a little bit of a blow up last week and a little bit of a blow up. All right, let's go. Let's go there. Yeah, Wasn't it seemed a big like a big blowout, but you pulled your support for the bill for that current draft? Yes. Yes. Why? Well, there was too many giveaways to Tradfri, if I can say that. Our view is that there should be a level playing field for this is allowed. This is not allowed. And then all the U.S. companies compete. And banks didn't like that. They were, in my view, like the commercial sides of these banks are very smart and the CEOs get it. And they're talking to us about integrating crypto. The bank lobbying groups and bank associations are out there trying to ban their competition, and I have zero tolerance for that. I think it's un-American. It harms consumers. And the banks need competition. They need to innovate. We also saw this from some of the securities broker lobbying groups, because, you know, tokenized equities are a big thing happening in crypto. So there was three or four kind of red line issues we saw in the draft text. And as I was in DC that day meeting with members of the Senate, I asked them, okay, is there a path to fix this after it comes out of committee? And they basically told me behind closed doors, if this comes out of committee with a bipartisan vote, we can't really help you on the full Senate floor. And so I felt like I had to stand up and say something, defending, defending our customers rights. And I was careful not to opine on what the Senate should do in terms of a markup or not. And I was careful not to say anything. We don't represent the whole crypto industry, but from a Coinbase point of view, I was not comfortable with the draft text as written and I'm glad that everyone came back for another round of negotiation while other people have been saying stuff. So since we've got, we're going here now. A journalist from Crypto in America said a White House source told her this is President Trump's bill, not Brian Armstrong's bill. At the end of the day, and that the White House is going to pull out if you don't come back to the table, you push back on this. What's really happening? Oh, yeah. I mean, this is not our bill. I actually I give all the credit really to the Senate. And certainly President Trump has said that this is a core part of his crypto agenda. So my impression is that the White House is fully leaned in here and wants to get something done, as do we, as do the bank CEOs that I met with today. So I'm not seeing any real barriers here. There are some people who are a little grumpy. I think they got caught off guard that we didn't we didn't support the draft as as is. But it's kind of like that metaphor of, you know, three blind people looking at an elephant and everyone's trying to figure out, you know, there's probably somebody in administration who had that point of view. But that's not the people we're speaking with, I don't think have taken that approach. They actually very much want to get this done.