I got to ask you about legislation as well. The long awaited crypto market structure bill has been delayed maybe by several weeks after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong helped stall the legislation. Do you agree with Armstrong that no bill is better than a bad one? Well, that statement is a statement in terms of Clarity Act. We're supporters of Clarity Act. We think it would be very good for the entire industry. Look, I just completed this roadshow. We're talking with a lot of investors that frankly aren't that familiar with crypto because crypto has been kind of locked out for the last several years. There haven't been a lot of, you know, digital asset related public offerings. So they're learning a lot. And as they look to what's happening in the regulatory world, they may not understand like what's the good and the bad of that particular market, the structure bill. But what they do understand is that we need a pathway where the regulators, the legislators and the industry are all moving forward in a positive way. So they're looking for that stamp from the legislative side to say that, yes, we're creating a path for digital assets. And when you read the Clarity Bill, the bulk of it is kind of a to be defined, you know, mostly under the oversight of the CFTC, and that's a good thing. It's going to take some time to sort out the final details. We absolutely need clarity and so on that part. I guess I disagree with the Coinbase team, but we're in support of getting good regulation here. Got it. And White House crypto adviser Patrick Witte posted on social media that to Coinbase that you might not love every part of the Clarity Act, but I can guarantee you'll hate a future democratic version even more. So it sounds like the White House sees the crypto industry as perhaps maybe overplaying its hand, or at least Coinbase overplaying its hand. Do you worry, Mike, that the midterm elections will result in a Congress that could be less friendly to your crypto industry? I guess I think about a slightly different way. You know, we had the previous administration, which was very negative on crypto. We had a lot of kind of just lockout for arbitrary reasons. We now have an administration that has been very favorable. I attended the White House crypto dinner that was back last February, and we're very fortunate. We have an administration that wants to make just a fair path and immediately came out with a number of executive orders which made that possible. Now, the feedback that we had, I think in bulk from many of us I gave this feedback to the president, is we would love to see this codified in law. And it's really hard to operate a business when you go from administration to administration. And the previous administration says 95% of these things are securities. The new administration says most of them are not securities. Right. Should not be arbitrary. How do you run a business if no law is changed? And yet the interpretation is completely black and white opposite from each other. So we're looking to see that fix. Definitely, getting this codified in law is critical. I hope it happens sooner than later. We're on the right side of history, though. This is going to come you know, traditional finance is here. The big players, everybody from, you know, Larry Fink to Abby Johnson, all of the all the players are here trying to make this work. I think it's an inevitability.